Jul 11, 2012

Posted by in Articles, Myomy Story | Guest Posts | 22 Comments

Fitness blogs: high quality vs. low quality. A viewer’s opinion.

Today’s post is by Sarah, an avid myomytv reader who wished to tackle the topic of what you should look for in a high quality fitness blog. With so many fitness blogs around, it’s very important to know how to spot the good ones. Thank you Sarah for taking the time to highlight these points for my readers.

Fitness blogs: high quality vs. low quality. A viewer’s opinion.

In the Internet age, fitness bloggers have the chance of showing lots of people all over the world what they can do. But the possibility of profiting from online blogs – through the number of views and consequent value of ads mechanism – has also encouraged lots of people with very little knowledge of fitness but high financial ambitions to improvise themselves fitness gurus (it takes only about 2 and a half months to get an online certification as personal trainer, without having ever trained anybody) in order to take advantage of this lucrative opportunity. The result of this phenomenon? In my opinion, the fitness industry’s image tends to be slightly ruined by these “online sensations”, who spread an extremely superficial and inconsistent idea of fitness and who have very little knowledge to support what they are supposed to be teaching online.

I think that recognizing high quality versus low quality fitness sites is quite simple. First of all, professional fitness experts often share their information with other fellow fitness bloggers: they are not jealous of their viewers, they are not scared to extend their knowledge to other fellow trainers and are not ashamed to ask for their advice if necessary. In quality fitness sites, information circulates in the whole fitness community (other fellow trainers included) and it is supported by evidence, science and extensive experience.
These sites are packed with interesting articles and also questions from viewers: how to perform an exercise correctly, how to prevent injuries, how to progress in strength, how to train in order to get certain results, how to train in case of injuries. And these questions almost always get comprehensive answers from bloggers, packed with valuable advice. In quality fitness blogs exercises are demonstrated with impeccable form, and the reason why form is important is also extensively explained. You can see that these trainers know what they are talking about, you can see that they understand the principles of biomechanics, you can see that they often attend professional update courses, workshops and seminars.
In quality fitness blogs, it’s obvious the main focus is actually on fitness: how to become stronger and fitter, how to become more resistant, how to have a healthy approach towards nutrition and body image, rather than ONLY focusing on how to look “hot in your bikini”.
Quality fitness bloggers tend to back up their assertions with scientific evidence, rather than preaching dogmas without even bothering to say what the sources of these dogmas are.

Some brilliant examples of what I consider high quality fitness blogs are Bret Contreras’ and Ben Bruno’s. But there are lots more, Marianne’s blog included: she shares her own experience, gives good advice, has great tutorials and she’s not ashamed to show her before-pictures which clearly demonstrate just how far she has gone in her fitness journey. The Girls Gone Strong concept is also what I consider quality fitness: a group of professionally experienced women who learn from one another, who get together to train and share their knowledge, who write posts in each other’s blogs (as in the case of Nia Shanks’ recent post in Marianne’s site), who share the same view of fitness.
This is how the “science” of fitness can actually evolve. This is how it can progress, grow and become better.

Needless to say, in low quality fitness sites it’s much more important to focus on the guru’s hair colour, the guru’s workout clothes, the location of the workouts. Rather than fitness blogs, they seem cult of personality blogs or exteriority blogs that cater for the needs of people who desperately need someone to emulate and look up to (usually, this happens with conformist teen-agers who have not fully formed their personality yet, but apparently nowadays lots of grown up people too have this same need).

In spite of this, I am very glad that the internet is full of excellent fitness sites where people can intelligently discuss fitness-related matters. And in case I ever needed some hair colour advice, I’ll know where to find it.

~ Sarah

Related Posts with Thumbnails
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
  1. Sarah — an excellent article.

    Part of me says that ANYTHING to get people working out and moving is a good thing. But if they hurt themselves, they could do serious damage that will last years, and they then may not workout ever again! We all tend to look for the easy solution and we want an instant fix, so these glitzy websites that offer 30 day transformations with just 10 minutes of work a day, are always going to attract interest. They encourage being part of a group, complete with a fashion statement. But at what price?

    As you probably know, one of the most popular of these groupie sites had a split a while back, and the original lady instructor has since developed a new following that is much more low key, and realistic. I have to give her respect for no longer relying on titillating camera angles to get her viewers. The other half of the team is still going strong selling their soft porn. Its troubling to think that they are contributing to desensitizing their impressionable viewers to proper social behavior.

    Give me Marianne any day! Her workouts are seriously tough, and she has the body to prove their effectiveness. She doesn’t shy away from questions or criticism, and seems always eager to help. We’re all lucky to have found this blog and all the wonderful people who visit here.

    ~ Gillian

    • Hi Gillian,

      I was referring precisely to those two sites and to lots of similar “wannabes” that are appearing almost every month. Whether with a higher or lower focus on the soft-porn touch (the less titillating camera angles may depend on her now much higher number of female followers, uninterested in constant cleavage-shots), I keep seeing in both sites a certain lack of quality in the type of fitness training provided. Risky exercises like headstands, wall walks or ninja jumps, questionable form and, sadly, a cult-following that would praise and profusely thank these “gurus” even if they uploaded videos where they wash their dishes or cut their toe-nails.
      Surprisingly enough, what you referred to as “groupie sites” seem to encourage a fanatic behaviour in viewer. No wonder, any even mildly critical comment immediately gets censored: these “gurus” are not to be questioned.

      Bret, Ben, Marianne and lots of other excellent trainers can handle criticism in their blogs and address it intelligently and with rationality.

      Sarah

    • I checked these sites out for a full 30 minutes before I realized I couldn’t figure out what the workout was – mostly I was just watching someone do some workout moves that showed off some body parts

  2. squirrel says:

    You are so right, Sarah! Love it!
    I have another sign of quality: Responding to questions and comments. I have no idea how our dear Marianne manages to answer almost every comment, but it is so important, especially if someone is desperate about nutrition/eating habits.

  3. chrysta says:

    Agree with this 100%. This is why there are only a few blogs I read, because I trust the info coming from them. This blog (of course!) all GGS girls blogs, Bret, Tony G, Jason F and Ben B. are the few I frequent. The info is solid, quality and they all show they have experience. I trust the content which is important. Its a little scary how you can get certified and immediately start dishing out advice. I know we all have to start somewhere but its best to learn first, really understand the concept then teach. This is one of the many reasons I love this site so much. Great, solid quality info from someone that knows her stuff inside and out.

    • Thanks Chrysta – though I am always feeling like I still have so much to learn. Even when I look back on the things I used to say, I realise how much opinions and research changes what we view as “better” etc … I think it’s good to be open-minded to change (and not too proud to admit when you were wrong), but also have a level of common sense about the info and claims you make.

      Cheers :)

  4. Mickela says:

    I think this article should be developed and posted here as a guide for people who are looking to follow guidelines on the internet regarding nutrition and fitness.
    The eye candy on the internet can be deceiving to people with little knowledge or who are desperate to get in shape.

    • Great idea Mickela! Maybe people will share it and help spread the message.

    • Hi Mickela,

      it’s a brilliant idea and I’m sure Marianne would appreciate any suggestion from her viewers on how to develop this article.

      The eye candy on the internet, as you call it, can be extremely deceiving for some uninformed people who base their loyalty to other sites on a completely false assumption: “if she looks like this, it means her fitness routines must be working”. The guru’s body automatically becomes the “evidence” of the site’s (and workouts’) quality.
      Apparently very few people bother to take a look at fitness gurus’ “before” pictures, which would show the role of genetics in how a person looks.

  5. Great post! You put the words right there, where I only had a weird sensation, thinking some sites where “wrong” somehow, too much marketing, too much product placement and unbalanced workouts.
    I love the way information is shared here and in related blogs. Thank you for putting that into clear words!

  6. I got caught up in the afore-unmentioned fitness website, it was as if I had drunk the kool-aid and couldn’t look away. So glad that I was able to disengage, find better/actual instructors and move on. It is crazy over there. Marianne is level headed and encouraging. Bret is crazy scientific good. I will check out the other links too. Sexism and misogyny have no place in a fitness website, I have also come across male oriented fitness sites that focus on bikini babes and outsized muscle men, it can go both ways.

  7. i stumbled upon a network of fitness bloggers, it took me a few months to realize they were really fitness enthusiast that liked to blog – though the network dubs them as fitness experts, there are even some certified trainers in the group, most really aren’t, some are, but most seem to be trying to get a career in writing or they want to host a tv show or something and are doing this by going through the fitness industry, they beg you to click on 50 links throughout their post, they sell products and ask you to buy them through their site, they occasionally post a workout here or there, but mostly it’s about what they ate or what they did with their dog and spouse over the weekend…that’s about it. it’s blatant self promotion, the thing is they have these big followings, the comments are something akin to a savior – these people truly love and want to emulate them no matter what. that’s when I realized, the “followers” are there to see what these people are going to do next, kind of like reality tv – they aren’t there for the fitness/health aspect at all, my cue to mosey on out!

  8. Nice essay. I think we need to think about what is a good fitness blog VS what is a poor fitness blog. Specificaly in this post, it would have been good if the post was more objective. I don’t know Marianne. It’s my first visit here. But the post suggest that Marriane is sooo good and the others aren’t. The link to Nia (wich I don’t know either) show me a moonwalk. Wow. This is what I am looking for in a quality fitness blog! Don’t get me wrong. I will visit those sites to have a better idea but the second link (to Bret) is an add or a pool. I don’t know. I close it right away.

    I don’t think that «answer to questions» is a demonstration of a quality fitness blog. It depend a lot on the amount of time the person put in the blog. But I think that the notions of biomechanics and to have scientific reference is Quality. Also, as a another commenter said here, well balanced routine is a sign of qyality. Specificcaly for this aspect, Zuzana Light have my vote. I always workout with her, never get injured and did not do the ninja jump or the headstand because I don’t want to get hurt. Basic jugement here. Some people can do it, some others don’t.

    I also think like Gillian here. I the blog make people move and workout, it is a good thing. But if they get injured, they will never workout again.

    For myself, I do workouts for more than 15 years now. I had personnal trainers, I know the signs of quality. I know with the explanations if the trainers give good advice.

    The good news of the day: I found this site, I can’t wait to visit it! Thanks

    • Hey Zolasoleil,

      Welcome to my blog and thank you for expressing your opinion :) I hope you will return and browse through some of my workouts.

      Cheers
      Marianne

    • Hi Zolasoleil,

      I tried to be objective. If you take the time to read some of the blogs I have mentioned, you’ll find that they contain all the signs of quality described in my article.

      Bret’s site for example is like an encyclopedia of fitness. He is extremely knowledgeable and his answers to his readers are very interesting, informative and comprehensive.

      Even if you don’t agree with the specific examples I mentioned (Bret, Ben and Marianne but there are lots more that I have not cited), I am sure that most people would agree on the general principles I have indicated. The circulation of knowledge among different trainers is often one of the most typical tell-tale signs of high quality.

      Cheers
      Sarah

  9. One name that hasn’t been mentioned is Leigh Peele. She is really amazing and thorough and I think her podcasts on binging may help change my life. I suppose her outlook is more on the diet portion of health, but that’s 90% of weight loss, so if you’re looking to lose, she may be your bag!

  10. In establishing good quality blogs, it is really important to define what the focus or topics should be. Is this a blog for the fitness guru or for someone looking to squeeze in a fitness routine at the office? Is it a blog where fitness owners, operators, managers, or investors come to share ideas and strategies? Or is it purely a blog with a pure marketing pitch behind it to sell the latest diet pill?

    Depending on the type of blog you want to subscribe to or write, you need to really define and focus what you are looking for. When you search for the term “weight loss” and look at the number of results you get (as of this writing, I got 414 million results on Google). You can get lost in the sea of search results and before you know it loose an hour getting back to where you started.

    Quality begins with a purpose.
    Get more Gym Business Insights at:
    http://www.gyminsight.com/insight

  11. Carrie Anderson says:

    Hi there, I find this conversation really interesting, as I followed a particular site we all know well for several years and, bam, now I have a muscle imbalance, having overworked my abs and not my core in its entirety, therefore giving me a bar of pain along my lower back in the days after any exercise except swimming. I’m not saying that site alone was the ruining of my back, but it played a pretty large part, and now when I look at the site it makes me cringe when I see all the ab-centric exercises crammed into workouts. Once a lengthy course of physio has hopefully sorted me out, I’ll be checking out this website more thoroughly and also lovingfit.com, which has been recommended to me. I would be interested to know if you’re aware of the latter site (obviously you’re aware of your own one!!) and your thoughts on it. And yes, it seems you were right all along about that particular website Marianne, which is perhaps why the site owner got so narky about it online with you!

    • Hi Carrie,

      Thank you so much for talking about this! I really do feel for you and I would certainly advise you now to focus on your posterior chain training and especially strengthen movements like the hip hinge, glute bridging, deadlifts, rows and also accessory movements for the core, like RKC Plank, side planks and Side Bends. Stay away from crunches for a while – I haven’t done a crunch in about 2 years and my core is still strong (functionally strong). For you, and a lot of others who perhaps followed this poor quality fitness site, I would advise 2 pulling exercises for every 1 pushing exercise and really to work on shoulder mobility and stability.

      These imbalances can be fixed :)

      I have heard of LovingFit.com, though I haven’t watched it much. From what I see, Tatianna comes from an athletic background which gives her a healthier and more balanced approach to training. She views it as MORE than just getting abs and looking the way society thinks is sexy. I really like her attitude and she wants to promote a similar message to me and the rest of Girls Gone Strong: Training for strength and performance will give you something deeper to commit to and you will be happier than always trying to achieve a look. Especially, when we are all so different in our genetic ability to look “fit”. What does that even mean?

      So, yes, I do recommend Tatianna’s site, because I can see she is different and it is not all about her own popularity – she wants to help people reach positive training goals first, and teaches that the rest follows.

      I hope this helps :)

      • Thanks so much for the advice Marianne, that’s more specific than what even my physio has given me in terms of exercises I should/shouldn’t be doing! I’ll look up the exercises and your workouts including them, and have a look around for more about ‘posterior chain training’ and let you know how it goes.

        It’s almost laughable to me now that they get away with advocating full body workouts, grinding away at the same muscle groups, six to seven days a week. Well, it would be laughable if it wasn’t so harmful.

        Thanks again, and hopefully in a couple of months I’ll feel brave enough to start working out at home again (minus the help of one particular website!)

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Good Reads – Vol. 3 | Jeremy Smith - [...] Fitness Blogs: High Quality vs Low Quality – Marianne Kane [...]

Leave a Reply